Bond at his Best
20.10.2008For my money, Casino Royale is the best Bond film ever made. Bond of late has been more about the gadgets and wry one-liners than it has been about the characters or plots. What we have here is a back to basics Bond, a gritty killer with a gun and his guile and nothing else.
We open with Bond achieving his double-O status by killing two people. This is shot in choppy black and white which makes the deed feel ugly and brutal, which is exactly what it is. This isn't a Bond who coyly kills three-dozen henchmen and tosses line over his shoulder with a wink and a smile. This is a Bond that knows the finality of death.
Bond is dispatched by M (Judi Dench on witheringly icy form) to do his country's dirty work. He's to track down Le Chiffre (Mads Mikkelsen), banker to the villains of the world. Both enter a high-stakes poker tournament; Le Chiffre to recover money from a deal gone wrong and Bond to stop him getting his hands on the cash. He's funded by and chaperoned by a treasury official, the smouldering Vesper Lynd (Eva Green), surely one of the most attractive Bond girls to grace the screen.
What follows is a tense poker game which plays around with all the traditional Bond conventions – Martinis, car chases, gorgeous girls, high stakes and all out action.
Daniel Craig does a superb job as the emerging 007. He's a flawed Bond, one that makes mistakes, gets hurt and realises that his actions have consequences. The slick detachment of the recent Bonds has been replaced by a fragility and humanity that you can see draining away as the film progresses.
Casino Royale is exactly what the franchise needed: a swift kick in the pants. If it weren't for this film, it'd only be a matter of time before Bond was saving the world with his Breitling watch whilst doing adverts for Diet Coke. This is what Bond should be all about: gritty realism, thrilling adventure, frantic action and substance. Shaken or stirred? Both.




Posted 05.11.2008
Yeah, pity that this review's about Casino Royale and not Quantum of Solace though innit?
Posted 02.11.2008
The story was weak although the action was vivid. Daniel Craig was excellent in a poorly scripted feature that had little thread throughout.
Judi Dench is always good, Olga and Gemma were supportive in their roles.
I think Mark Foster's direction was totally lacking and took the franchised James Bond character away with little panache, whilst lacking the normal Bond humour, wit and even sarcasm.
The editing missed in a number of places and it showed through in the lack of visible realistic continuity on several occasions.
I took a party of people to see this film last Friday night and we all came away without the normal Bond feeling at the end of the film.
We have never seen so much publicity for any Bond film before Quantum Of Solace - it was obvious why the distributors needed such blanket coverage to fill the cinemas over the weekend. It was a disappointing film.
Let us hope that Michael Wilson and Barbara Broccoli realise how much the old Bond will be missed and get it right for the next Bond spectacular.
If you want better action with good well put together scripting then any of the Bourne series are better than Quantum.
And have you seen Liam Neeson yet in Taken - if not do so now and you will get tremendous value!